mcwilly18 wrote:
Plus u did play 4 games against intermediate teams. That's essentially like a bye.
We have two more wins than you guys (obviously two more games played). Hypothetically if you guys played 2 more games there is no way you would shut out both teams, therefore giving us the two seed. Our teams played twice with us winning the first and you guys winning the second, therefore the 46-44 argument is pretty weak honestly.
You can't tell me a 5-3 record is better than a 7-3 record? In the MLB the team with the 7-3 record would be 1 game ahead of the 5-3 team because a win is a half of a game, which is fairly common in any sport. Why wouldn't teams just request to have bye weeks then when you could get a seed higher than a team simply bc you played two less games? We should have only played half a season so we could be 4-0 and get the one seed by that logic.
We played 3 A teams (which is not our fault due to the scheduling). We played Cena twice (for whatever reason and the time we lost we were missing either 3 or 4 of our guys including our QB, but yeah that's still no excuse) with one of our guys on that team despite us giving Wyatt a roster of all our players and who's on what team, and we played Pho who are hands down better than SGI and Kekambas. I'd even argue that Cena would beat SGI and Kekembas could go either way.
Playing less games shouldn't be an advantage, and that's why Power Rankings are there to account for that. In the Power Rankings we're above you guys by over 1000 points (which takes into account Point Diff, W/L, SOS, and games played). If our schedule was so weak, why are we significantly ahead of you guys in PR?